The graph illustrates the daily hours between UK people their age over 4 years about Radio and TV around a day in Oct to Dec 1992.
It can be clearly seen that the peak point reached to about 46% of population who spending about 20 hour per day on watching TV, while the lowest point had been recorded about 3% of population at 2 hours daily of watching. In addition to the line has a dramatically increases, where it up and down suddenly.
On other hand, about 25% of population spent their time in listing the Radio recorded the highest number of daily hours about 8 hours, while the break point reached about 3% who listen to Radio 1 hour daily. Also, this line has similar to the first line for the issue of up and down.
In conclusion, it is obviously that UK population who watching TV spent time more than who they listen to Radio.
- The report of world population growth (rewrite)) 73
- The diagram below illustrates the carbon cycle in nature. 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The following bar chart gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Wri 72
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 73
- People should work a fixed number of hours per week, and employers should not ask anybody to work more than this. Do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...46% of population who spending about 20 hour per day on watching TV, while the lowes...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 695.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42675159236 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32465752703 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9229498728 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.833333333 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130793947566 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763289929849 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495836600559 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904607574291 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531214682993 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.