do you agree or disagree? the rules that the whole societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.
Since young people are not mature enough to be aware of the result of their behaviors, societies are implementing some rules for young people. With this in mind, a heated controversy exists about whether the rules of societies are strict for young people or not. I, personally speaking, believe that the rules by which society can force young people are extremely strict. There are some reasons for my point of view, two of them are controlling the young people and showing them the right way. In the following paragraphs, I will substantiate my idea.
To begin with, being energetic is one of the characteristics of the youth, and it can be controlled by imposing the rules. Should do societies control young people, they will impose the strict rules. By so doing, societies are more able to control and monitor the behavior of juveniles. Some strict rules prohibit young people from doing some inappropriate tasks. In another world, the more strict the rules are, the more possible to decrease the crime rates. The fact that if young people break laws, they will condemn to go to jail is very crucial to control the youth's behaviors.
The other equally significant reason which is worth mentioning is that the strict rule shows juveniles the right way and put them into the right track because juveniles are not aware of the consequences of their decision. Putting it differently, showing the best way is one of the responsibilities of society. If people had been restricted by their decision, the world would have been a better place for living. Accordingly, in order to avoid some problem in societies, the rules are strict enough to pave the way for everyone's success. Take my own experience as an illustrative example. When I was a 13-year0old boy, I had some thoughts in my mind. I wanted to have my own gun and use it for fun and hobby. Watching movies and series, I was motivated to own a personal gun. Had my society not imposed the strict rules saying that people are not allowed to have a personal gun, I would buy the gun. If I bought a gun, I would have a different destiny because it would possible either to kill someone or hurt myself.
All in all, by taking all the aforementioned reasons into account, one can conclude that the rules which are imposed by societies are highly strict for young people, for not only societies are going to control young people, but they want to make young people aware of the consequences of their decisions. I firmly recommend that societies should pass lows that are too strict for young people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-22 | daryash72 | 72 | view |
| 2018-09-26 | saeede | 66 | view |
| 2020-12-25 | Pooja dave | 76 | view |
| 2018-11-07 | raminshahbad | 76 | view |
- PO 18 Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that governments should spend more money to improve internet access not on public transportation? 73
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task 83
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing TaskA recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 73
- TPO 50 Integrated Writing Task 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75900900901 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62314106459 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463963963964 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0237961926 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8695652174 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3043478261 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.69565217391 5.45110844103 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242919491793 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794403298378 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727337545563 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176781572634 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666492640769 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.