The illustration reveals the blueprint of Brandfield City with two proposals for the location of shopping center. It is clearly seen that the first site is in the northern area while the other is in the southeastern part.
S1 is the first proposed area for shopping mall and it is located above the city center. On its north west side are household residences making it a feasible location for a mall while on its east side flows the river and a vacant lot is seen after it. Moreover, it has easy access to roads and railways for hassle free transportation.
The other plan location is in the southeastern part of the map and is called the s2. It is under the city center but it is beside the industrial estate and is located far away from houses though it is surrounded by roads and railways just like the first site. The golf course and park occupy the far west side of the map which makes it impossible to build a shoping mall.
- Life cycle and anatomy of a lady bird 78
- Consumption of fast food by Australian teenager 11
- Percentage of people rating certain factors as important when buying a new house 90
- the line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries, and the pie chart shows the percentage of books by type that were borrowed over this time. summarize the information by selecting and 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4476744186 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4933863303 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6972380332 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.625 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192478001212 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911181504887 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070402567064 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136024018222 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155654562144 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.