It is true that the education system has enhanced its way of teaching by providing gadgets like laptop and tablets to students rather than books. While the internet has become a boon for them, it may harm the traditional way of learning. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of this trend.
There are many reasons why giving a laptop to students can be beneficial. Firstly, Students can gain access to learning resources quickly with the help of internet. They can connect the laptop to the network and search whatever they want to learn. Secondly, They can refer to multiple online books without getting up from their seats. Unlike with books, they are required to look for arranging for different books and that too is limited in most of the schools. Thirdly, the Internet serves you the latest content, thus students do not need to worry about finding the latest books, they can easily get those online with the few clicks. Finally, many newspapers are also available online, Hence, many students prefer to read online news rather than reading from a single newspaper.
On the other hand, giving laptop and tables instead of books can turn into a bad idea. Most of the students feel uncomfortable reading online, they are reluctant to use a laptop due to its bad impact on eye sights. Moreover, books and printed material are more reliable than the network. For example, if there is any network issue then it may result in disconnection and can hamper the access to online books and resources. But books will always remain the same. Furthermore, students will be more concentrated while reading books, they might lose focus by unnecessary ads poping-up on websites. Thus, students can go through unwanted websites which can be avoided if printed books and materials can be handed to them.
To conclude, it can not be denied that students will be more benefited from reading through gadgets with the network, However, we cannot ignore the bad impact it might have on them.
- Should computers and tablets completely replace books in schools and universities Write an essay giving your opinion 56
- News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is your opinion about this? 73
- University lecturer is now able to put their lectures on the internet for students to read and so the importance of attending face to face lectures has been reduced. Do you believe the use of internet in formal education is a good idea? What future effect 78
- Nowadays many parents believe that children’s usage of tablets or computers would be good for their future academic career. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such belief? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 67
- The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesights'.
Suggestion: eyesights
...o use a laptop due to its bad impact on eye sights. Moreover, books and printed material a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, while, for example, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88461538462 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39779529759 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541420118343 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5677614365 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7222222222 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0598953753859 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0257188203493 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259867863325 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0361686055623 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248521026868 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.