Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and trying to reserve these animals is a waste of resources. To what extant do you agree or disagree?
God has created variety sort of creatures for own purpose. So, they deserve our respect. Humans are responsible for preserving wild even domestic animals I order to prevent some problems in ecological process and their extinction, increase rate of tourist attractions and preserving because of their usage.
To start with, animals belong to food chain hunt weaker animals for self preservation. Beside that, food chain act upon to balance the population of animals, but unfortunately, sometimes hunter account for some species to extinguish. Government should create inflexibility rule to obstacle hunting of certain animals sort.
Further more, nowadays with developing of technology, some wild animals are very valuable for scientists to use their poison in medical usage. For example apothecaries use animals poison in some scarce drugs that are very vital for humans health.
Last, but not least, tourist attraction is one of the earthshaking income for nations economy. Government, with constructing artificial shelter or preservation park for wild and nadir animals, can engrossed tourist to whom fervid wild life. So, official beside preservation of wild life, they can provide invisible trade to earn money or more investment on the preservation project.
To take long story short, it is showy that each creature of god is not only frivolous but also purposeful. Hence, we are responsible for protecting god blessing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-02 | Shakil1012 | 90 | view |
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuses the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 73
- Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced. They only care about how much it costs. How true is this statement? What influences people when they buy food? 61
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and trying to reserve these animals is a waste of resources. To what extant do you agree or disagree? 71
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and way of life died of. It is pointless to try to keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Do you agree or disagree living with animals, such as owing a pet, cat or bird, is good for people? Use personal examples to illustrate your response. 56
Comments
thanks for correcting my
thanks for correcting my essay
fervid Suggestion: ?==> i mention that with constructing artificial shelter or preservation park for wild and nadir animals,governments can engross tourists for whom are enthusiastic to wild life or that kind of scenes.
There is a button 'Edit'
There is a button 'Edit' beside the button 'View'. Click it and you can re-edit the essay.
entence: Government, with constructing artificial shelter or preservation park for wild and nadir animals, can engrossed tourist to whom fervid wild life.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to can and engrossed
entence: Government, with constructing artificial shelter or preservation park for wild and nadir animals, can engrossed tourist to whom fervid wild life.
Error: fervid Suggestion: ?
flaws:
No. of Words: 220 350
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 220 350
No. of Characters: 1173 1500
No. of Different Words: 140 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.851 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.332 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.823 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 89 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 74 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.923 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.329 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.645 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.096 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5