Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People education has been an important issue since the down of time. Throughout history, this is a controversial issue that subject offered by universities should be filed by an equal number of male and female students. It is agreed that instead of accepting an identical number of both sex, universities should give a same opportunity for students to choose what they want to study.
Firstly, for some certain work position male can have better performance than female. For instance, it is obvious from this that there are more policemen than policewomen. This argument will be proven by looking at how man can run faster. Men are stronger, and they can react to a dangerous situation more quickly. As this show, males are suitable for this job. In this case, universities should accept a large amount of males to well training them to the future.
Secondly, when it is come to teach in schools, especially in primary schools, it is no doubt that females are lucrative for this job. Children prefer to be taught by the female's teachers, hence, this women teacher treat as a close friend or even as a mother. An instance illustrating this in action is when a child accidentally hurt his thumb, his female teacher would hold him in her arms to comfort him. However, male teacher may tell the child that it is not a big problem. This makes it clear that teaching subject in university's needs more female students.
In addition to this, nowadays, men and women can take any job, learn any skill and study any major that they want. For example, engineering sectors now welcome both men and women students. Another example is the fashion industry which in this age dominated by male designers. As a result, there is no obstacle for particular sex to learn or study and universities should provide more chances for both gender.
In conclusion, it has been proven that, male and female need to be more encouraged to study based on their enthusiasm not according to their gender.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | tatadaigia | 22 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Skhanuman1 | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | wIsaac | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | nguyen thi thu hien | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | nguyen thi thu hien | 56 | view |
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nation. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the needier nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree or disagr 61
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuses the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 73
- In many countries, children are engaged on some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experiences important for learning and taking responsibility. What are your opinions on this? 67
- Some people believe that children’s leisure activities must be educational, otherwise they are a complete waste of time. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- proportion of population aged 65 and over in Japan, Sweden and USA 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81764705882 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61261247502 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9509178071 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2105263158 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8947368421 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05263157895 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198788466144 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638315035784 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789398135246 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117051744256 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889489619751 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.