In my opinion, men and women should have the same educational opportunities. However, I do not agree with the idea that every subject should accept equal number of students in both genders.
It would be unrealistic that every subject could attract the same numbers of male students and female students. As we all know, men and women have different preferences when they choose their majors. Generally, men tend to major in subjects which are quite challenging and exciting, such as computer science and electronic engineering, while girls are much more likely to major in some subjects like nursing and finance, which emphasis more carefulness and patience. For example, nursing subject, may need to wait a extremely long time until it attract enough male students, and this process would definitely be time-consuming and have some negative effects on universities' work-flow.
On the other hand, this regulation would lead unfair to some high-grade students. Nowadays, students all over the world choose their subjects mostly based on their own test grades, and it is a general sense that excellent students should be given more opportunities because of their hard-working lives. If subjects are distributed based on students' gender, an idea that hard-working is useless will be spread out, then as the time goes by, people's ambition will be harmed. Finally, I truly believe this measure will have an opposite effect on promoting fairness.
In conclusion, it is unrealistic and harmful to let each subject in universities accept equal amounts of male and female students.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The table shows the percentage of very good rated by first year students 92
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period. 73
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations. 67
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...mple, nursing subject, may need to wait a extremely long time until it attract en...
^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mbition will be harmed. Finally, I truly believe this measure will have an opposi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31474103586 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81656118986 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593625498008 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9748736461 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.272727273 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276122589875 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115222073934 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135908479454 0.0667982634062 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208286750198 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101662460269 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.