Nowadays the soaring traffic and accommodation issue are becoming major pain points due to the population explosion in the metropolitans. While some people believe that it could be tackled by relocating companies and employees to the rural areas, I disagree with this opinion because I believe that it would have adverse impact on other areas.
On the one hand, I agree that moving companies to countryside would mitigate the traffic and housing pressure in the urban center. If plants are largely relocated to the countryside, most of the workers would tend to rent or purchase the apartment near the companies in order to save time spend on daily transportation. It means that it would decrease the accommodation pressure in the center of the cities, which are already over-crowded. In addition, the traffic would be dispersed in wider regions if the companies are distributed out of the center.
However, I would doubt that this would not be as effective as they assert, and it might have harmful effects on environment and business benefits. Firstly, the public transportation network of the countryside, in most cities, might be extremely poor or even not be covered. It is not practical for people to rely on the public transportation daily. In this case, people might prefer to drive private cars to work , and it would unexpectedly impose a heavy burden on the road transportation and increase traffic fume pollution. Secondly, it might affect the business benefits of the companies. Some companies might rely on the regional clients and suppliers. In this case, relocation might lead to loss of customers and increase the cost of the product.
In conclusion, it seems that relocation would decrease the pressure in the city center, but in my opinion, it does not effectively solve the problem and might trigger other side effects.
- Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more prons to living in an apartment. Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment? 11
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities can cause serious problems in both places What are the serious problems and what measures can be take to solve the problems 81
- Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities can be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside To what extent do you agree with this opinion 84
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places. What are the serious problems and what measures can be taken to solve this problem. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ght prefer to drive private cars to work , and it would unexpectedly impose a heav...
^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rease traffic fume pollution. Secondly, it might affect the business benefits of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12582781457 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93032882106 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523178807947 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7076672418 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.571428571 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208283112429 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660580356783 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501667531052 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123726501066 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283913956992 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.