Human beings have a natural instinct to seek social acceptance. Because of this ideology, many people tend to imitate trends that are already proven to be socially acceptable such as in the cases of the latest mobile phones and fashion outfits. I acknowledge to a full extent has this mindset has affected our tendency to imitate others.
To begin with, most in trend fashion styles is believed to boost self-confidence in many ways. For one, many people find fashion ensembles being donned by trendy people as flattering for their bodies that they aim to duplicate their attire in order to look as good as their trend-setters. A case in point is when zaftig models wear dresses that only slender women used to wear can entice full-figured ladies who follow that public figure to also don the clothing. This can then give rise to a new fashion revolution. Another point is how the popularity of apparels encourage a number of consumers to purchase it. To cite, wearing denim tops over denim jeans used to be a fashion peeve, however, sine vogue stars, that is the Kardashians, started modelling them, a lot of people began to thin that the style is acceptable and indeed eye-catching, in a positive sense. Hence, the popularity of the trend nowadays.
Moreover, the proliferation of certain consumer goods in the market has leveled par with the significance of clothing in human tendencies to imitate. That is, the ownership of consumer goods poses a great deal of pride to most people, especially if the owners have seen these items being used by successful people. The capability to purchase gadgets such as cellphones, cameras and laptops is already a financial accomplishment on its own, even more so when they are of highly coveted brands and range. Say for example, smart phones have become a prevailing gadget especially to the working class, not only for its convenient features, but mostly because of the influence of the success and achievements of their brand ambassadors, such as the awe-stricken success story of Steve Jobs of the iPhone. Additionally, it is important to cite that consumers mostly replicate ownership of things they see from other people because on envy. This could probably be from seeing the convenience the users are experiencing, or how they look well-endowed or accomplished with having the items. In that case, the copier might want to also present himself in the same status.
To conclude, it is not wrong to assume that copying other people is a common human tendency. These are evident by the prolific spread of certain types of fashion and gadgets, which are argued to be caused by how they increase self-esteem, or how they are being modeled by popular personalities. Furthermore, ownership of gadgets impose some sense of pride and reduces envious feelings.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 87
- The tendency of human being to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree? 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- Some people think that it is a good thing for senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of the same company or organization. To what extend do you agree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 196, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...ashion and gadgets, which are argued to be cause by how they increase self-esteem, or ho...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, well, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2342.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 468.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00427350427 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79949107279 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0264341003 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.1 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181340839599 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544115896458 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435255443614 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109623946975 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181926851584 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.