The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:
“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin.”
The given argument states that the autonomy of a country is based on the strength of it's borders and this is directly related to the security of a country with respect to illegal immigrants. If a count cannot be kept of the number of illegal immigrants entering the country, then it's economy and national identity are endangered. Hence it suggests that illegal immigrants pose threats and must be made to return to their country of origin. There are a number of assumptions present in the argument which we will consider in the forthcoming content.
Firstly, the argument states that autonomy of a nation is solely based on it's borders' strength and security present. It undermines several other parameters and overlooks their presence in deciding a crucial and important thing like autonomy. The country's growth, economy, policies, governance and quixotic morals are also imperative to decide on its status of autonomy. The influence or the clout that the country has over the world, it's involvement in making decisions on a global scale and the interdependency that it shares with other nations pertaining to trade, external affairs, etc., also makes key contribution to decide whether it deserves to be autonomous or not.
To further strengthen this haphazard assumption, the argument adds an adjoining explanation which states that the if the country is unable to check the number of illegal immigrants, its economy and national identity are at risk. Here the assumption made is that the country is incapable of documenting the entry of an illegal immigrant and hence the entire scenario is not within control. Next, it assumes that all illegal immigrants are a potential threat and only by rejecting their presence completely can we protect the economy. It assumes only the negative traits of a probable illegal immigrant. As a solution to these problems, it suggests the only option is to deport the immigrants to their country of origin. Here, it assumes that the immigrants would accept going back to their country and have in the first place left their homes not in a wilful state.
To prove the assumptions unwarranted we can look at some data which gives information about the immigrants, their previous circumstances and their current role in a country to which they migrated illegally. If these statistics show that they have had a salubrious impact on the society in general after immigration and their roles have contributed significantly to the country's economy then the argument holds as fallacious.
Also such demeaning policies would bring the country and its government in unpropitious circumstances and bad light when we consider humanitarian causes. Hence, the assumptions should be made considering all aspects of the given subject and considering all possible possibilities without having unwarranted bias towards the nature of illegal immigrants.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | nikki1610 | 63 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Mat Pro | 69 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | bishal sitaula | 59 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Roshan Dhakal | 59 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | man_si_jain | 72 | view |
- "The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar."Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your 58
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to add 50
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 89
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 55
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 66
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 461 350
No. of Characters: 2377 1500
No. of Different Words: 218 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.634 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.156 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.848 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 185 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 151 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 100 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.611 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.826 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.722 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.336 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.555 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.131 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...y and national identity are endangered. Hence it suggests that illegal immigrants pos...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...en the argument holds as fallacious. Also such demeaning policies would bring the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, so, then, as to, in general, with respect to, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 11.1786427146 170% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 28.8173652695 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 55.5748502994 108% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2426.0 2260.96107784 107% => OK
No of words: 461.0 441.139720559 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26247288503 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90667270974 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 204.123752495 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483731019523 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 768.6 705.55239521 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7111663959 57.8364921388 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.777777778 119.503703932 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6111111111 23.324526521 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.70786347227 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348790330895 0.218282227539 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118984885438 0.0743258471296 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899514286706 0.0701772020484 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203464276955 0.128457276422 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126477468113 0.0628817314937 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.3799401198 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.3550499002 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.197005988 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 98.500998004 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.