Do you support that nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes
It is believed that the development of nuclear technology should not be used for any destructive purposes and it should only be used for some constructive activities. I personally agree with the statement and my essay will shed a light on nuclear technology in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, it is true that nuclear technology should only be used for some positive activities since it could be serious threat for humans. The nuclear technology are utilised as a weapon, it could be used to kill people. For instance, atomic bomb have capability to destroy the planet in a short period. Besides that, the leakage of the nuclear plants also give negative impacts on human health, radiation will increase the risk of cancer.
On the positive side, nuclear technology has been widely used in medical science. For instance, X-rays are mostly used in medical diagnosis. Radiotherapy is used to cure some diseases such as cancer. So, it help to save the lives. Second, most of the countries in the world struggle for the electricity. The nuclear powers are great source of energy for these countries and it is effective solution to tackle this problem. Many scientists prove that nuclear electricity is more efficient and eco-friendly to the environment, as it produces less carbon. Last but not least, it helps to improve the quality of food and to eliminate the malnourished tragic items.
In conclusion, it is cleared that nuclear technology could be used for constructive or destructive purpose. But I support that nuclear technology should only be used for positive activities such as power plant or as a medical treatment and never used for destructive purpose becuase it can be serious threat for humans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-14 | ililmaidatuz | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | hungdung2507 | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-20 | Mubaidullah | 67 | view |
| 2022-03-29 | Walter Nguyen | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-12 | iu | 56 | view |
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Other thinks that it is better to work for different organisations. 61
- Do you support that nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes 68
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Other thinks that it is better to work for different organisations. 61
- The chart gives information on the percentage of British people give money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 56
- The charts show the percentage of water used for different reasons in six areas of the world. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...re some diseases such as cancer. So, it help to save the lives. Second, most of the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08833922261 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82742927032 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508833922261 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1382327892 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.523677015706 0.244688304435 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170015852105 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166538837014 0.0667982634062 249% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.378097651009 0.151304729494 250% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135195397811 0.056905535591 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.