The given pie charts illustrate the changes in yearly spending in UK school in three different times 1981, 1991 and 2001.
In general, it is clear that teachers’ salaries took the majority proportion of total school spending in all three charts, while insurance took the smallest.
Only two parts of charts demonstrate stability, namely “other workers’ salaries” and “insurance”. The first shows a gradual decline, when the second shows a slight rise and dramatic increase from three percent to eight percent between 1991 and 2001.
In 1981 40 percent of the school budget went on teachers’ salaries; this figure rose to 50 percent in 1991, but fell to 45 percent in 2001.
The percentages of “resources” and “furniture” fluctuated. “Resources” reached highest peak in 1991, 20 percent; “furniture” hit the peak in 2001, 23 percent.
To sum up, according to the three charts, we can conclude that teachers’ salaries used the most of total spending.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the average monthly use of health club in Miami and Florida by all full-time members over last year. The pie charts show the age profile of male and female members. 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these couses affected three regions of the world during the 1990 couses of land degradation by region? 56
- To some people studying the past has little value in the modern world. Why do you think it is important to do so? What will be the effect if children are not taught history?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 102, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'reached the highest'.
Suggestion: reached the highest
...apos; fluctuated. 'Resources' reached highest peak in 1991, 20 percent; 'furnitu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, while, in general, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73548387097 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.050482686 2.65546596893 153% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625806451613 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1867732449 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140659231042 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896092755811 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107429714129 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108690076738 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113830086222 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.