Some people think the media – television and films – negatively affect people’s behaviour. Others do not think so. How do you think the media affects people’s behaviour? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Over the past decades, countless forms of media channels entailing television and films have burgeoned around the globe. While worldwide audiences are entertained by these productions, it is widely believed that the media has an overall negative impact to public behaviour. The aim of this essay is set to explore how the decadence of social behaviour is related to the media development.
To begin with, it is intuitively obvious that the unmanaged context of the mass media has a significant role to play in shaping general behaviour. In fact, to tempt the audience, film producers often incorporate toxic components in the productions to cover the colossal investment. For instance, recent empirical research from the Blockbuster Committee ascertained that 90% top ranked films are classified as class III, whereby numerous improper scenes with sex and violent behaviour are blended. Seen in this light, the idea disseminated by these commercial film tends to be negative. Therefore, people who absorbed the ideology behind these media are likely to behave detrimentally in the society.
Meanwhile, another pivotal component to remember is that the major audience of media are lied in the age group being highly susceptible to media content. What this means is that people who are at their formative ages tend to mimic the histrionics performed by their beloved celebrities to acquire a sense of identity. Having interviewed by the Juvenile Delinquency Bureau, 90% child criminals admitted that they learnt the skill of theft encompassing pilfering and burglary from television programmes. Consequently, the violent scenes shown in television has a high tendency to implant a message fostering crime in juniors
In conclusion, media generally have begot a negative consequence on public behavioural cultivation due to the pervasive improper context embedded and susceptibility of immature audiences. Given the strength of these evidence, it is predicted that the government will enact any measures to censor the inappropriate factors in media productions in foreseeable future
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-20 | RockyGagKy | 49 | view |
- Some say you should always marry for love; others say that in an uncertain world it's wiser to marry for money.Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion.You should write at least 250 words. 84
- The bar graph below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six subjects at a US university in 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The table shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006. 78
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. 11
- Parents or other adult relatives should make important decisions for their (13 to 19 year-old) teenage children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your writing. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nels entailing television and films have burgeoned around the globe. While worldw...
^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lain'.
Suggestion: lain
...is that the major audience of media are lied in the age group being highly susceptib...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54858934169 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04599618943 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623824451411 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4305648559 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.153846154 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189566243635 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063181871031 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331525867277 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111958697501 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325808816604 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.