In recent years, technological innovations and the liberation in human perception of life have had an immense influence on family connections. In my sentiment, these developments have both positive and negative effects.
On the one hand, there are several merits resulting from the contemporary lifestyle to family relationships. First, new technologies have had the significant impact on the interaction and connection of humankind. For example, cutting-edge internet applications and modern services like Facebook and Skype respectively, which allow people not only to keep in touch with their family members but also to help them can take video to make face-to-face meetings via computers or telephones instead of using written letters or telegrams. Furthermore, this means of communication also helps people save time as well as money considerably and sparks the tremendous change in their frame of mind. Secondly, there is now a sense among most parents that are likely to be more open-minded and easy-going. Nowadays, most parents allow their children to voice their personal opinions and to comfortably pursue their dreams, jobs or pastimes based on their own volition. Finally, the modern lifestyle also encourages people to be more independent and self-reliant and render people manifest less strain and stress.
On the other hand, these developments can be extremely negative. From my perspective, the availability of new communication technologies can also have the result of isolating people and deterring them from connecting with each other in real interaction. To be specific, people always take away telephones or computers when they are work or go outside for some personal purposes and make they seem to be dependent on these modern applications. As a result, they spend less time with their family members and it gradually shatters their family relationships. Another major drawback is the less respect to the elderly and parents in families of the young demographics. That means that some youngsters appear to underestimate and ignore several traditional values of families. Finally, the direct consequence of the modern lifestyle is the high rates of divorce in many countries in the world.
In conclusion, the modern lifestyle has certainly changed human means of communication and the ideas of life, but not at all of the outcomes of these developments have been positive.
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels health and fitness is decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 95
- Doyouagreethattheadvantagescarsbringoutweighthedisadvantages? 11
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 43
- Some people think that the government wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view? 78
- Some people think that a huge a mount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 122, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ation and the ideas of life, but not at all of the outcomes of these developments have bee...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44892473118 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1166048061 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3036590678 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.235294118 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0932381825647 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339822803137 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447724594754 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0598722227071 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176829408243 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.