The bar charts show how people of various age groups are more prone to purchase tickets online for cinema, theater and concert events in Australia, UK and Malaysia. Their preferable means of ticket purchases are also detected.
To begin with, in Australia and the UK the percentage of people aged between 25 and 40 for both tickets online was significantly higher than the same category of customers in Malaysia and was approximately 54%, while in Malaysia a mere 37% of people of the same age group could buy the tickets online. Furthermore, the elderly in Australia were more likely to use the Internet to purchase tickets than in the UK or Malaysia and were nearly half the total percentage. It is also next to those that the elderly people in Malaysia were involved in the line tickets to cheer this more than their younger compatriots.
Besides, the most common way used to buy tickets was personal computer in all countries with approximately 60% of purchases done in this way. Obviously, laptops had the second level among preferable ways of access with average 40% in Australia and Malaysia and a noticeably lower in the UK (30%).
Overall, it is obvious that the most active age group in online purchase was 25-44 and the most popular access to purchase tickets was the desktop computer.
- Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a
- The diagram below shows how potato chips are made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 69
- The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth which can cause tooth decay High acid levels are measured by low pH values
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, second, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89189189189 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60179493897 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6218305473 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.75 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229282911537 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108838446768 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895504593094 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162292228089 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852870498903 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.