Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of Some people thinks that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that examples can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, Keeping pets can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common trend and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, examples might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the faulty systems would relate to this reality that the demerits of n pertain to n. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by the prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it's correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of keeping pets for children are good or dangerous and unhealthy far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes but also social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-08 | mojtaba1980 | 77 | view |
- sports, playing in a team or individual? what are the reviews and possible solutions for that? discuss. 85
- extreme sports 88
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree? 88
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53454545455 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11750270898 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632727272727 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6027994886 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.833333333 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267868705515 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075812786379 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114389725165 0.071462118173 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147322676367 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921547075119 0.0609392437508 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.