The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant..
The diagram illustrates, before and after renovation works of an island tourist services. Overall, the first diagram shows island completely emptied with some sort of trees alone. Whereas, after revival which has a tremendous changes in their landscape.
Initially, Over 100 meter has the most significant innovation done for the tourist facilities like, accommodation, restaurant, and pier constructed. On the center of the Island there was a main reception area covered with numerous small houses for accommodate the tourist. Each houses were joined with footpath which is a continuation of vehicle track around the reception and lead to restaurant and pier.
There were accommodation constructed on right side of the reception area with nine and other side with six small villas. Tourists can do swimming near to the beach on left side and there were a foot path as well. In addition restaurant and pier were in an opposite direction of island.
- The diagrams below give information about the Eiffel Tower in Paris and an outline project to extend it underground Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown You should write at least 150 words 69
- Some people think that in this modern world getting old is entirely bad However other people believe that the life of old people is much better now than it was in the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- More and more people today are visiting extreme places such as Antarctica or the Sahara desert What are the advantages or disadvantages of such travels 73
- In some countries lifestyle of people changing rapidly and this affect family relationship the advantage of this outweigh the disadvantage 67
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in canada from 1992 to 2007
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and completely emptied with some sort of trees alone. Whereas, after revival whic...
^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...s, after revival which has a tremendous changes in their landscape. Initially, Over ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'meter' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'meters'.
Suggestion: meters
...their landscape. Initially, Over 100 meter has the most significant innovation don...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on done for the tourist facilities like, accommodation, restaurant, and pier cons...
^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...all houses for accommodate the tourist. Each houses were joined with footpath which ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... and there were a foot path as well. In addition restaurant and pier were in an opposite...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, whereas, in addition, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27631578947 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84743044003 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638157894737 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8198889747 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1111111111 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15234189694 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683750323426 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597592477882 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10711206349 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618530237043 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.