some people believe that zoos are no useful purpose others believe that zoos are beneficial in many ways discuss and give your opinion

Essay topics:

some people believe that zoos are no useful purpose.others believe that zoos are beneficial in many ways.discuss and give your opinion.

The pro's and con's of the zoo is a heated topic of controversy. It is often argued that there is no benefit for the conservation of zoos, while, others believe that which would have many useful purpose as well. However, in my opinion protecting the different kinds of animals, study of their growth and well being, preventing the extinction of species are the basic responsibility of every common man, which would be applicable by the help of zoos only.

To begin with, natural calamities, increased cultivation, and deforestation are the main causative factors of animals extinction. By the help of zoos, wild life conservative technique are in a progressive ways. For example, Leopard is considering under the violation of human attack, and which would be the category of endangered animals. So that, the zoos are offering the homes and help to breed their offspring's. Furthermore, caging of animals in certain area become helpful for the zoology students and scientist, to research the wild life animals living strategies, and better to learn and love the nature by the animals who is protecting in the zoos.

Have someones believe like, caging the animals in a special area would become the wrong-doing of animals rights. It is right in some way, if they are treating the animals in bad way and attacking them for the purpose of comic shows and so on. To control this attitude towards the animals in the cage would help them to longevity of such species. From the ancestral days animals are kept protected in the zoos and that would make use of studies and research of zoology. By the virtue of that only the modern world knows the various kind of animals and birds are lived in this world too.

In conclusion, protecting the animals in the cage is benefit for the wild animals and humans as well, in contrast to protect themselves. Whilst, preventing the devastate of this creature by the zoo management also to be cared. If we do so zoos are more beneficial to the disciple and ourselves.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-08 Akashdeep Singh 67 view
Essays by user eyraen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...increased cultivation, and deforestation are the main causative factors of animal...
^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich would be the category of endangered animals. So that, the zoos are offering ...
^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wild life animals living strategies, and better to learn and love the nature by t...
^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. Have someones believe like, caging the animals in a special area would beco...
^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... protect themselves. Whilst, preventing the devastate of this creature by the zoo management ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, in contrast to, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83965014577 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69321171078 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513119533528 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9579713465 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141246884362 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052523208946 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504394133954 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965074033271 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522941535087 0.056905535591 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.