People learn in different ways,. Some people learn by doing things, other, people learn by reading about things, others learn by listening to people talk about things, which of these method of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support you

Today's hectic life it is an astounding fact that people from all walks of life differ greatly in their attitudes towards this phenomenon. Some people believe that best learning method is listening. However, some people states best learning method is reading. In my point of view, best method for learning about anything is listening.

The main reason for my opinion is, people can use the listen something while doing something else. It goes without saying, when people read something, people can not do anything else. On the other hand, people can easily listen lecture or podcast while doing something else. For instance, I am a software engineer. When I want to learn new programming language for my job, I search for podcast for that programming language. After, I listen these podcast while I am in bus or in a car. This learning method can be usable everywhere and it saves enormous time. All in all, the learning with listening is the best method owing to the fact that people can listen podcast or any learning material while doing something else in the same time.

Another reason is that, learning with a listening more effective. That means that, while people read something in the book people can easily forget what you read. However, when people talk about something in one topic definitely people remember this topic so listening is more effective learning method. For example, when I was in university, we had a tough course which called digital systems. The book of the digital systems course was so boring and not interesting. That is why I can not remember the information which I read in that book. I studied for the midterm exam with this book and my midterm score was very low. Moreover, my friend suggest one channel on the internet. This channel actually not a lecture, the two people just talk about digital circuits. However, I watched the series of channels like a movies. And I remember every single detail about the topic. Thanks to that channel, my final grade score was very high. As a result, most of the time people forget what they read so reading is not efficient way for learning. However, people can definitely remember what they hear. That proves listening is more effective way of learning.

In sum, some people may oppose the idea that listening is best learning method. Not only people can listen while doing something else but also people remember every single detail of what they listen. University student should try to study their courses with the listening learning method.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the best'.
Suggestion: , the best
...g method is reading. In my point of view, best method for learning about anything is l...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...eason for my opinion is, people can use the listen something while doing something else. I...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 815, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a movie' or simply 'movies'?
Suggestion: a movie; movies
..., I watched the series of channels like a movies. And I remember every single detail abo...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2098.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89044289044 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3999251061 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438228438228 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8921208496 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.9333333333 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439988339912 0.236089414692 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128978793154 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108665903169 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314375715197 0.150856017488 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449823763562 0.0645574589148 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.49 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.