Truth is certainly the hot-button issue of the moment, specially, living dynamic changes in all the life sectors. At the heart of the debate over the crucial truths beings as mysterious or uncomfortable, and facing myriad of attacks till accepted it. However, from my point of view, I disagree with the statement. To substantiate my case, this essay will illustrate my points and examples.
To begin with, the first and the foremost point coming to the mind is the multifarious benefits that comes from revealing truths and amount of positive changes that has impacted our life. In other words, without knowing for example the electricity conduction, production how it works and the cardinal effect of it on the humans life.We open a dispute for our ancestors, namely, in the past using electricity was debatable and some of them prefer to continue using old methods such as fire to lighting their houses.
Moreover, the second vital point should be taken into consideration is revealing truths will lead to facilitate our life and avoid us from arguable questions by focusing more how to improve all the aspects. One striking example, it is better to think how to use the renewable energy how to maximize the benefit from it, instead of arguing against useless subjects such using renewable energy is good or not. So, the end result is well round data base, that will burgeon the world, if we take the positive aspect from discovering truths.
It is true that accepting truths is not easy because ordinary people prefer not to get out their comfort zone and prefer to follow inherited rules, habits, and traditions from their cultures, to feel more reassure and certain. In contrast, some people vary eager to know every new truths in order to flourish their minds and get exposed for different facts, and the impact of it very limpid on the developed countries unlike the third world countries.
In conclusion, and due to aforementioned reasons and examples, truths are unarguably important and shorten long distances for people, and expectation of any attack is part of truths success.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 50
- The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors."Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fats and cholesterol, and today low-fat produc 26
- Both the lecture and the reading passage discuss how agnostids were live as marine animals,and extinct about 450 million years ago. While, the reading passage state that there are several theories about hoe agnostides may have lived. the lecture refutes t 76
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
- tpo27 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ks and the cardinal effect of it on the humans life.We open a dispute for our ancestor...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: We
...ardinal effect of it on the humans life.We open a dispute for our ancestors, namel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, well, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in other words, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02005730659 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62932978066 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618911174785 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.7343916823 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0833333333 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5833333333 5.21951772744 241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132037181934 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503038214684 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684420970305 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786428423483 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532020673765 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.