A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract
and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
Nowadays, we are living in a word full of violence, disputation, and quarrel. No single day passes without seeing, reading or hearing about such misdemeanors and wrongdoings. And the most dominant commentary hitherto is whether to deny those committing crimes from their civil rights and even their own sustenance. As far as I’m concerned I believe to some extent with the author’s assumption that any culprit should get punished for doing a guilt but, that retribution to be commensurate with his wrong act. In the following paragraphs, I will delineate my point of view with clear examples to support my point.
First is first, the penalty should be proportionate with the type of crime. We can not say that a felony crime like terrorism and murdering innocents, forcible rape or kidnapping equal to shoplifting crime or speeding ticket. It’s not at all reasonable to give life imprisonment to a poor person forced to steal a retail to avoid dying from starvation. And it is worth mentioning that the Italian court has ruled that stealing food is not a crime if you are homeless and hungry. In such cases, even the crime is committed knowingly, the intentions are not to harm the society; therefore, they shouldn’t be retained from their basic rights.
Another case to consider is the traffic ticket notice. The majority of drivers have been given a ticket notice once in their lives. Albeit, It’s an obvious breach of the country’s laws, but not justifiable to retain their civil rights and put them in jail. Now, it’s crystal clear that the type and severity of punishment differ according to the situation.
On the other hand, those who commit felony crimes intentionally and without any good motives should be punished strictly and to be deprived of their rights to be a warning sign for anyone thinking to do the same. Although, I read an article yesterday stating that capital punishment and deprivation from basic rights, for example, have not effect on crime deterrence and another survey on American prisoners telling that such severe sanctions didn’t prevent them from committing crimes or pursuing a career in crime but, that study, in my opinion, can not be generalized. There are hundreds of cases of individuals for instance, who were willing to kill, kidnap, rape or rob and the strict policy that will be applied for doing such shameful acts hindered them from proceeding. And that doesn’t mean if they actually did the unlawful act their rights and benefits should be confiscated regardless of their different scenarios. This is because over strictness can worsen the situation and might create a monster out of that criminal; thereby could be very dangerous for the society.
Finally, and as I’ve mentioned earlier, that some crimes like terrorism and the bad people of ISIS “Daesh” for instance, should be deprived of all their basic rights and societal benefits because such brutal people are a real threat to the whole world not only their societies. They kill innocent kids, women and elderly people without mercy and with no real reason. Only in such cases, we have to apply these strict rules of retaining their civil rights or the right to benefit from their own labor because there is no hope those barbaric groups will turn to be good.
To sum up, it does matter if the crime is done intentionally or not and the motives for committing the crimes should be taken into consideration as well. Dealing with all situations equally is not justifiable. The above examples of different types of crimes and the stimulus for doing so bear this out.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | Mithil | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Gnyana | 62 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | Yam Kumar Oli | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 624, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith clear examples to support my point. First is first, the penalty should be pr...
^^^
Line 6, column 341, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'effected'.
Suggestion: effected
...rom basic rights, for example, have not effect on crime deterrence and another survey ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 341, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...rom basic rights, for example, have not effect on crime deterrence and another survey ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 14.8657303371 229% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3037.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 603.0 442.535393258 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03648424544 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9554069778 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76556061884 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 316.0 215.323595506 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524046434494 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 923.4 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.454309877 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.48 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.12 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237743848194 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630657797769 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656235958197 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127542176563 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383040817029 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 158.0 100.480337079 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.