In the recent times, travelling to distant destinations and community are on the increase. Inspite of having some bad effects on environment, I strongly believe that organised tours are having a positive impact on the native people both socially and economically.
Increased tourism has created many problem for aboriginal people. These tours have degraded their environment by polluting it. The expansion in these type of tours have resulted loss to the local biodiversity of Flora and funna. These tourists have been bringing with them life theartning diseases, viruses. For example swine flu or Ebola viruse were spreading very fast from one location to another with infected person. The tours have been creating pressure on the natural resources of the native places by coming in large numbers. For example, recently Shimla a tourist attraction place had water shortage problem due which all local people suffered. There are many examples when due to tourists activities the main attraction site degraded so much that tourist has stoped to visit the area. And the sudden decrease in number of tours have resulted into number of job loses.
But, all these problems are having solutions too. By proper planning and support from native people as well as from tourists, local authorities can prevent many of these drawbacks. Moreover, these tours have many positives for domestic people. The first cardinal benefit of growing toursim is increasing job opportunities. Growth in employment has resulted in better living standard. People will have more disposable income and govt have more tax collections. Secondly, by these tours world has knowing about the culture of far flung areas and local people has been konwing the outside world culture. In short toursim helps to make culture diverse. Thirdly, these toursim has brought with them the latest technology and ideas, which have been helping aboriginal people to improve their life standards.
To conclude, these tours might have many bad impacts on community and in environment but by proper management and with help of people's support these tours will be a millstone for the growth of a community. I believe that tourism have more positive impact than negatives impacts
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y 56
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y 73
- SOME PEOLE SAY TELEVISISON IS USE FUL FOR EDUCATION, WHILE OTHERS SAY IT IS ONLY USEFUL FOR ENTRETAINMENT.DISCUSS BOTH VIEW AND GIVE YOUR OPINION 67
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment? 73
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places What are the serious problems What measures can be taken to solve this problem 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'many problems'.
Suggestion: many problems
...cally. Increased tourism has created many problem for aboriginal people. These tours have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...resulted into number of job loses. But, all these problems are having solut...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, in short, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30422535211 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56858471826 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546478873239 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4520533541 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5909090909 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1363636364 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68181818182 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225443892658 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666876346441 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513149783942 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153513353065 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286652024019 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.