Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is often argued that all tertiary level students should choose subjects of their interest, while others would say that they should only be permitted to study specialties which will be beneficial in the future such as engineering and medicine. Although the undergraduates achieve higher grades in the courses of their choice, I believe that subjects related to science and technology will be more useful for their career.
On the one hand, the scholars gain higher marks if they will be allowed to study whatever they like. This is because they read these topics with passions and interest, and it leads to a better understanding of concepts. For example, according to a recent report published by the Delhi University, the average score of students who studied subjects of their wish was 10% higher than those who took courses without having any interest in it. However, I believe that students career does not only depend on grades but on the usefulness of their branch of study on the development of the society.
On the other hand, subjects such as math, physics, and biology enable students to get employment just after completing studies. That is to say that these streams are in demand in the job market because the people having knowledge of science and technology can help companies in developing useful products. For example, in Japan, most engineering undergraduates got job offers from various organizations even before completing their respective degrees.
To conclude, while the students get a higher percentage in college degrees if they will pursue subjects of their interest, I believe that students should be allowed to study those subjects which will be more useful in their career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | hueminh | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | D_g_b | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Farhad1010 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Farhad1010 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Farhad1010 | 61 | view |
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y 67
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y 73
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y 56
- Organized tour to remote community and other countries is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment? 84
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, for example, such as, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13978494624 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68033265521 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52688172043 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.158138216 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.4 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416379791896 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164191232649 0.084324248473 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122390064308 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271081114906 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107687343014 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.