using the example of the vacuum cleaner explain when it is legally acceptable to use exaggeration in advertising and when it is not

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 456.0 578.828451883 79% => Need more words or more difficult words.
No of words: 121.0 151.265690377 80% => More words wanted. You may: choose simpler words or speak faster or remove hesitations or remove long pauses, and fully use the time, do NOT save one or two seconds.
Chars per words: 3.76859504132 3.82278263415 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.31662479036 3.50058242952 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.78497091477 1.80425224433 99% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 92.4686192469 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.685950413223 0.61298525976 112% => OK
Syllable count: 146.7 182.283891213 80% => OK
Avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.20543933054 100% => OK

Performance on coherence:
Topic speech coherence ratio: 0.0939658100306 0.0839705835288 112% => OK

Acoustic performance on paragraphs:
How many acoustic paragraphs: 14.0 4.47071129707 313% => Need less acoustic paragraphs.
Average paragraph length: 8.64285714286 65.8948926009 13% => The average paragraph length is low.
STD paragraph length: 5.10751746878 19.7758100068 26% => OK
Average paragraph duration: 4.10785714286 25.5208953607 16% => The speaking content is not well organized.
STD paragraph duration: 2.5457532665 7.49434385956 34% => OK

Acoustic performance on sentences:
How many acoustic sentences: 49.0 42.9832635983 114% => OK
Average acoustic sentence length: 2.4693877551 3.78147595546 65% => OK
STD acoustic sentence length: 1.90704430795 2.94285465224 65% => OK
Average acoustic sentences duration: 1.06959183673 1.39386743896 77% => OK
STD acoustic sentences duration: 0.598610497135 0.967747756167 62% => OK

Acoustic performance on acoustic silence:(An acoustic silence means a little pause between two or more words)
How many acoustic silence: 37.0 40.4456066946 91% => OK
Total acoustic silence duration: 7.85 7.59280334728 103% => OK
Average acoustic silence duration: 0.212162162162 0.19053887516 111% => OK
STD acoustic silence duration: 0.203591205873 0.157467062838 129% => OK

Acoustic performance on acoustic words:
Total word duration: 41.39 46.3453556485 89% => Need to talk more.
Average word duration: 0.342066115702 0.308780311121 111% => OK
STD word duration: 0.182909982626 0.201157623399 91% => OK

Disfluencies: like hesitations, or 'ehn' or taking a long time to pronounce a word:
How many disfluencies: 12.0 8.09623430962 148% => It may have 'ehn' in the speaking, or it has hesitations or overlapping speeches.
Total_disfluencies_duration: 8.89 6.56692468619 135% => Somehow the hesitation is serious.
Total acoustic noise duration: 6.55 3.53066945607 186% => It may have issues on recording quality or have issues on silences or disfluencies.

Acoustic rates:
Total speech duration: 57.51 59.5455230126 97% => Talk more. Do not save time. People can talk 4-5 words in one second.
Compare to expected duration: 0.9585 0.992425383543 97% => OK
Rate of silence: 0.643366371066 0.681803438845 94% => OK
Rate of speech: 2.10398191619 2.53813033465 83% => Need to bring more content.
Rate of speech by unique words: 1.44322726482 1.55221717717 93% => More unique words wanted.
Rate of word duration by unique words: 2.00531529355 1.99939622689 100% => OK
Average articulation rates: 0.361563082645 0.309613076454 117% => OK

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by speech e-grader: 15.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the speech e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas.

When it comes to advertising, using exaggeration, or puffery, is legally acceptable as long as the claims are so outlandish that they are not meant to be taken literally by a reasonable consumer. For example, stating that a vacuum cleaner "sucks up all the dirt in the universe" would be considered puffery because it's an exaggeration. However, if an advertisement claims that a vacuum cleaner "removes 100% of dust and allergens" and that claim cannot be substantiated, it crosses into false advertising, which is illegal. When discussing vacuum replacements, it's crucial to ensure that any claims about their performance are backed by evidence and are not misleading, to avoid any legal pitfalls. This approach keeps consumers informed while maintaining trust in the brand.