In many countries, the tradition of families eating meals together is disappearing.
Why is this?
What are the effects of losing this tradition on families and on the society they live in?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Eating well goes beyond to choice nutritive aliments, the meal is an experience that must be lived totally. The attitudes as sitting on the table, engaging without externs distractions in the company of friends or family that makes the difference in the busy daily routine. However, unfortunately, nowadays this culture is increasingly difficult to be possible.
The modern life, the current excess commitments, the sparse time and also the negligence had been the responsible for the loss a family’s tradition eating together around the same table.
Something so simple as dedicating one hour of time to share a meal with your family can affect positively your life in several ways. Certainly, the impacts will be significant of losing this tradition on families as for instance: sitting down to bounce a meal off someone, the people can share your experiences which they live every day and it helps to reinforce the relationships.
In other words, using less than ten percent of your week to keep good habits with your beloved people can drastically change someone’s life, especially for children, because at this time the parents have the opportunity to encourage their kids to eat a balanced meal, as well as being able to exchange ideas and values.
At last, that is a fact that needs reflection, not only because it interferes in inter-family ties but also interferes on the society as a whole, since the custom of eating alone, too quickly or inattentive can make you lose your notion of what or the quantity consumed. Consequently, this may contribute for development of obesity, not to mention the tendency to create a strong sensation of loneliness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-01 | monicaherrera | 67 | view |
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- BUYING THINGS ON THE INTERNET, SUCH AS BOOKS, AIR TICKETS AND GROCERIES, IS BECOMING MORE AND MORE POPULAR.DO THE ADVANTAGES OF SHOPPING IN THIS WAY OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES?GIVE REASONS FOR YOUR ANSWER AND INCLUDE ANY RELEVANT EXAMPLES FROM YOUR OWN KN 61
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT THE BEST WAY TO IMPROVE PUBLIC HEALTH IS BY INCREASING THE NUMBER OF SPORTS FACILITIES. OTHERS, HOWEVER, SAY THAT THIS WOULD HAVE LITTLE EFFECT ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND THAT OTHER MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN 56
- Some educationalists argue that non-exam, arts-based subjects, such as music, drama, art, and craft, should be compulsory in the secondary-school curriculum. They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance.To what exten 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ime to share a meal with your family can affect positively your life in several w...
^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t helps to reinforce the relationships. In other words, using less than ten perc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, well, as for, for instance, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11678832117 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93496016253 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63503649635 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.0420611355 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.777777778 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4444444444 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282960397456 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104995240243 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527895747782 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144185375613 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473296282275 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.