Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The necessity of adding history as compulsory course for all students in various fields has been, for years, in the limelight of discussion among the educators, where people never seem to see eye to eye. Regarding this issue, the given statement, in my opinion, should not be considered as reasonable.
When it comes to history courses, some may argue that they are greatly beneficial to students. Admittedly, the virtuous circle of taking history courses for those who major in social science is obvious. For a student who studies sociology, history courses help them form a better understanding of the culture, the potential reasons for people’s certain behavior, and in turn broaden her knowledge and enhance her research abilities in her own fields. Besides, history courses, cultivating perseverance and confidence in young people, have educational significance. Only if we learn the hard-working of our ancestry, which laid the foundation of the country for us, we will start to treasure the current well-off life. In light of the educational function of history courses, it is very conducive to take some history courses for students.
However, the advantageous aspects of history courses do not imply that they should be added to the list of compulsory courses. In fact, considering of the actual burden of students have already, it is unrealistic to require every student to take history courses. In current universities, students are fed up with the whole day studies of professional courses, which already lead them to the verge of burning out. If the headmaster now announce that history courses are compulsory, for those who want to do good on both history courses and professional courses, they may be stressed out by the burdensome courses. In order to save time for studying, they may sacrifice their sleeping time, shorten their meals, or eliminate the outdoor activities, which are harmful for their health. Even worse, some of them may even get depressed. Hence, the unfavorable side of adding history as compulsory courses is unavoidable, by any means.
Furthermore, history courses don’t have direct benefits to students in certain subjects, such as mathematics, botany, or astronomy. In order to make a revolution in their field, they need to devote themselves into the hard-working of researches. Specifically, they can decrease the time they spend on professional realm, and put them into the study of history courses. Such decisions, however, will harm their future career potentially. Let us assume two mathematics graduates, one getting straight A in all the courses, and published papers on top journals by proofing some important theorems, while the other taking courses in history, whereas the GPA in mathematics being quite poor and owing no publications. Which student is more prefer by the employers? Certainly the former is the desirable candidate.
To sum up, history courses are of advantages to certain degree, which is conducive to add as electives for students who are interested and have the energy to take them. Nevertheless, considering the fact that the disadvantages of adding history courses as compulsory outweigh the advantages, it is an unwise decision to make, and we should avoid requiring all students to take history courses.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Student activities do as much benefit as academic study 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- The government wants to improve the education of high school, and there are two plans:1 choose a group of good teachers and train them first, and after that let them go back to schools and train other teachers.2 provide training for every teacher online 76
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books We recommend that Monarch Books open a caf in its store Monarch having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years has a large customer base because it is 89
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, whereas, while, in fact, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2779.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 523.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31357552581 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96288153301 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520076481836 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 864.9 618.680645161 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2506339294 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.791666667 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7916666667 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234207113248 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709493328905 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445416723968 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149335178513 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291285961398 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.