The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a
European country between 1987 and 2007
The line graph indicates how many international tourists visited three different destinations namely coast, lake and mountain and series 3 in a European nation over 2 decades from 1987 to 2007.
Overall, the numbers of visitors to those 3 areas all increased significantly during that period and, to be particular, lake and mountain experienced the fastest growth in the figures of guests.
In 1990, the statistic of people who went to the coast accounted for the highest among three at 40 thousands. In comparison with this, just about 20 and 10 thousand holidaymakers came to lake and mountain and series 3 respectively. By 2002, the number of travelers to the regions of river and mountain surpassed that to coast and peaked at more than 70 thousand individuals after a period of dramatic growth. Following the same pattern, there’s a moderate increase in the figures of coast to 60 thousands in 2002. Meanwhile, series 3 witnessed a substantial variation to just under 30 thousand guests over the same period.
By 2007, while the figures of visitors to series 3 went up averagely to about 35 thousands, that to lake and mountain fell drastically to 65 thousands. The statistics of coast also decreased to 55 thousands after peaking at 70 thousands in 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-03 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-14 | huyen nguyen ngoc | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | Rachel83 | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
- The percentage of workers in a company graduated with science and art degree 87
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 81
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 56
- . 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...highest among three at 40 thousands. In comparison with this, just about 20 and 10 thousan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05213270142 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96979848836 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57345971564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4966665185 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.444444444 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113885938124 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444322174572 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537977626849 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854126481298 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525922682699 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.