A glance at the provided pie charts illustrate the percentage of three age groups of the inhabitants living in Yemen and Italy in 2000 and predictions for 2050.
This is such a clear-cut evidence from the provided information that in Yemen, people live over 60 years old accounting for the smallest proportion while most of Italian are from 15 to 59 years old in both years.
To begin with, it can be seen clearly that in 2000, 0-14 years group was the most prevalent in Yemen with 50.1%. Neverthless, it is predicted to rank second in 2050 with only 37.0%. By contrast, the number of people belong to 15-59 years group will occupy the largest percentage in 2050 (57.3%) whereas it was only 46.3% in 2000. As can be seen, over 60 years has not been common not only in 2000 but also in 2050, standing for 3.6% and 5.7% respectively.
On the other hand, the position of each group in Italy seem not to change in both charts. After 50 years, 15-59 years group still keep the biggest percentage. It cannot be denied that the same situation occured to the others when people from 0 to 14 years old has always been the smallest group (14.3% in 2000 and 11.5% in 2050) and the rest has always been for over 60 years group.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The old tradition of a family having a meal together is disappearing. Why do you think this is happening? How does it affect individuals and the community? 61
- Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions. 47
- Some people think museums should be enjoyable places to attract and entertain young people. Others think the purpose of museums is to educate, not to entertain. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 61
- Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, still, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45089285714 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28898604429 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558035714286 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4872778228 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.777777778 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139625347926 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659381049659 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544799832889 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10583672559 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591720345688 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.