The article is talking about "let is burn" policy. Article states that this policy caused more damage to everyone and give an example of Yellowstone in 1980 which is most famous national park where it burned for two months and spread over huge area and give three kind of caused to support. However, the professor refutes all reasons saying that it is natural part and it is fundamentally good for nature.
First, the reading says that Yellowstone fire caused tremendous damage to trees and vagetation and some smaller plants were entirely incinerated. However, the professor reture this by saying that it actually increase new plants after fire and it increase diverse trees and vagetation. Also some plants seeds are not burned in fire so they also ready to grow. They give an example that after fire many smaller plants are again growing up.
Second, the article says that fire affects park's wildlife as many large animals like deer and elk were seen fleeing the fire and smaller animals were unable to excape. However, the professor refute this by saying it brings new opportunity for animals. As trees were again plant so smaller animals life rabbit can also find place in park and it brings food chain of this smaller and large animal becomes stronger.
Finally, the reading says that fire compromized the value of park tourism and it puts negative concequences for the local economity as local business depended on park visitors. However, the professor refute this by saying that it only occurs in 1980 and that year has massive climate changes and after that it never happended again. After that year, every year tourist come to visit this park so assumption of negative effect is wrong.
The article is talking about "let is burn" policy. Article states that this policy caused more damage to everyone and give an example of Yellowstone in 1980 which is most famous national park where it burned for two months and spread over huge area and give three kind of caused to support. However, the professor refutes all reasons saying that it is natural part and it is fundamentally good for nature.
First, the reading says that Yellowstone fire caused tremendous damage to trees and vegetation and some smaller plants were entirely incinerated. However, the professor refute this by saying that it actually increase new plants after fire and it increase diverse trees and vegetation. Also some plants seeds are not burned in fire so they also ready to grow. They give an example that after fire many smaller plants are again growing up.
Second, the article says that fire affects park's wildlife as many large animals like deer and elk were seen fleeing the fire and smaller animals were unable to escape. However, the professor refute this by saying it brings new opportunity for animals. As trees were again plant so smaller animals life rabbit can also find place in park and it brings food chain of this smaller and large animal becomes stronger.
Finally, the reading says that fire compromised the value of park tourism and it puts negative consequences for the local economy as local business depended on park visitors. However, the professor refute this by saying that it only occurs in 1980 and that year has massive climate changes and after that it never happened again. After that year, every year tourist come to visit this park so assumption of negative effect is wrong.
- Integrated WritingIn the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies 85
- "Two years ago, the town of Seaside Vista opened a new municipal golf course and resort hotel. Since then, the Seaside Vista Tourism Board has reported a 20% increase in visitors. In addition, local banks reported a steep rise in the number of new busines 50
- Government should provide the poor and the homeless with houses 80
- Space TourismSoon there will be something new for the tourist who has been everywhere and seen everything on Earth. Spacecraft being developed by private commercial companies will soon enable private citizens to buy their own tickets to travel into space, 80
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the num 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
...nd spread over huge area and give three kind of caused to support. However, the prof...
^^^^
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...y increase new plants after fire and it increase diverse trees and vegetation. Also some...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... increase diverse trees and vegetation. Also some plants seeds are not burned in fir...
^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...s. As trees were again plant so smaller animals life rabbit can also find place in park...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, if, second, so, kind of, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94425087108 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29551417486 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508710801394 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8737051312 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.153846154 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330695037924 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126743545485 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199112894454 0.0662205650399 301% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242988806464 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.299513440578 0.0443174109184 676% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.