In the reading passage and the lecture have conflicting opinions about whether the declining Torreya Taxifolia can be successfully protected from being extinct or not. The author of the reading section strongly postulates that those declining Tortrees can be preserved and the author provides a myriad of possible methods to save them. However, the lecturer adamantly delineates that the methods mentioned in the article to preserve such trees do not provide gratifying solutions.
First, the author of the reading section avers that by re-establishing these trees to their native location they can be protected. It is mentioned that its original location is enriched in micro-climate which will assist them to flourish. In contrast, the lecturer casts doubt on the claim. She thinks that the environment of the northern part of Florida has become unfavorable in these recent days. Furthermore, he argues that due to the effect of Global warming its authentic cool climate has been converted into the dry-land.
Next, the author asserts that by transferring and locating to a new unique location such trees can be preserved from being extinct. The article posits that with the help of assisted migration these plants can be grown in a prosperous condition. Nonetheless, the lecturer contradicts these claims by saying that transferring to a novel place might be vulnerable to the local tree species, among them few might already be in rare position. She elaborates on this by mentioning that Torreya plants might cause hazardous impact to the local plants.
Last, the writer claims that these Torreya plants can also be grown in research labs. The article notes that in research centers these trees can be grown successfully with a close monitoring and scientist also can perform their investigation works inside the centers. On the other hand, the lecturer rebuts these claim by saying that such grown trees inside the centers will not be genetically strong enough to resist in environmental dangers. She puts forth the idea that the number of raised trees will minimal and those will not have sufficient capabilities to withstand the natural impacts.
In sum, the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all the claims and ideas presented in the reading passage.
The reading passage and the lecture have conflicting opinions about whether the declining Torreya Taxifolia can be successfully protected from being extinct or not. The author of the reading section strongly postulates that those declining Tortrees can be preserved and the author provides a myriad of possible methods to save them. However, the lecturer adamantly delineates that the methods mentioned in the article to preserve such trees do not provide gratifying solutions.
First, the author of the reading section avers that by re-establishing these trees to their native location they can be protected. It is mentioned that its original location is enriched in micro-climate which will assist them to flourish. In contrast, the lecturer casts doubt on the claim. She thinks that the environment of the northern part of Florida has become unfavorable in these recent days. Furthermore, he argues that due to the effect of Global warming its authentic cool climate has been converted into the dry-land.
Next, the author asserts that by transferring and locating to a new unique location such trees can be preserved from being extinct. The article posits that with the help of assisted migration these plants can be grown in a prosperous condition. Nonetheless, the lecturer contradicts these claims by saying that transferring to a novel place might be vulnerable to the local tree species, among them few might already be in rare position. She elaborates on this by mentioning that Torreya plants might cause hazardous impact to the local plants.
Last, the writer claims that these Torreya plants can also be grown in research labs. The article notes that in research centers these trees can be grown successfully with a close monitoring and scientist also can perform their investigation works inside the centers. On the other hand, the lecturer rebuts these claim by saying that such grown trees inside the centers will not be genetically strong enough to resist in environmental dangers. She puts forth the idea that the number of raised trees will minimal and those will not have sufficient capabilities to withstand the natural impacts.
In sum, the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all the claims and ideas presented in the reading passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-10 | Rowsanstha | 80 | view |
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 37
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 90
- In the reading passage and the lecture have conflicting opinions about whether the declining Torreya Taxifolia can be successfully protected from being extinct or not. The author of the reading section strongly postulates that those declining Tortrees can 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little might'.
Suggestion: little might
...e to the local tree species, among them few might already be in rare position. She elabor...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, then, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1373.03311258 138% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24861878453 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74688443019 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513812154696 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2248839133 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.764705882 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436900669976 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140679663314 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.19500200132 0.0662205650399 294% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242977681142 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.218043162104 0.0443174109184 492% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 63.6247240618 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.