Studying the play and theatrical arts in the schools is beneficial or not. Discuss both sides.
One of the most conspicuous trends of the today’s world is a colossal upsurge in a number of students showing interest in learning plays and theatrical arts as a subject. As such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, although I am of the opinion that former outdo the latter.
There are a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one stems from the fact that learners can get the deep information and true image of a specific civilization. Not only, can students learn about the rituals, customs, culture, and what not, but they can also understand the history of bygone era. Needless to say, all these benefits stand pupils in good stead as far as, their quench of thrust to know about human behavior is concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can be easily overwhelmed with the potential benefits of studying plays and theatrical arts. Primarily, study of aforementioned subjects is sheer wastage of time and energy as in the cut-throat competition, pupils need to learn the course that are in high demand in industry. Hence, it is evident why many are against the former notion.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, the merits of gaining insight into plays and theatrical arts are indeed too great to ignore.
- Medical technology helps to live a long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind? 77
- Should voting be compulsory for all citizens or people should have freedom to choose not to vote. What is your opinion? 85
- Should teachers punish students for late submission of assignments in universities? 84
- Law changes human behaviour. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Whether studying films at school is as important as studying literature? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...ormer outdo the latter. There are a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al arts are indeed too great to ignore.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92410714286 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66819044939 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620535714286 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 379.143842365 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5230525715 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.3 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 7.25397266985 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160656413684 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513144890357 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541292364776 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949699160328 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434972008884 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.