The bar chart below shows shares of expenditure for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year of 2009.
The graph illustrates the spent of amount on different things by various kinds of major categories in 2009.The data calibrated in percentage.
Have a look on the first aitum of food, United States and Canada utilised near around 15% money on this however, a fifth consumed by the United Kingdom whereas, Japan was just above a 2% as compare to the former. All categories were equal amount spent on housing about under a half quarter while, United States slightly over with 25% rather than the others in 2009.
By having a glance on the transportation, the same year United Kingdom consumed less than a fifth and Japan was 5% lesser than with the comparison of former. Moreover, health care was negligible figure but which consumed 7% money through the United States. In case of clothing, whole categories expenditure similar proportion and stagnant on almost 6% in 2009.
Overall, higher proportion utilised on housing in major categories with the difference of other things.
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by chienese people between 1985 and 2010. 78
- Now a days, parents too much pressure on their children to succeed. What is the reason for doing this. Is this a negative or positive development. 22
- The diagrams show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purposes 78
- The Chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries. 56
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...rious kinds of major categories in 2009.The data calibrated in percentage. Have a...
^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'categories'' or 'category's'?
Suggestion: categories'; category's
...ited States. In case of clothing, whole categories expenditure similar proportion and stag...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04320987654 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64224211183 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9699129011 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281653600706 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118619349639 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312033608399 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148625397582 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649097717968 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.