Modern technology has taken over everyone around this world. Every new development and progress made so far has impacted people in desirable and undesirable ways. Social media has deeply entrenched the society and people in a pessimistic manner. I completely agree that networking websites have resulted in more adverse effects in our surroundings.
Firstly, social websites have taken control of people's life. Half of the content on these is either fake or manipulated. The most affected age group is youth and the teenagers as they have lost interest in their studies. Behavioral changes like stubbornness, rebel attitude, rude, misbehaving with parents and adults; who want them to concentrate on activities which are helpful for them. For example; teenagers follow bloggers and vloggers blindly and want to imitate them, dress like them, to buy things they showoff; but they do not realize that real life is far different from videos and pictures posted on Instagram, youtube or facebook. Secondly, people start comparing their lives with their friends, acquaintances etc. who pubilicze their personal lives on media; which might lead to social and peer pressure.
Furthermore, the privacy of a person using these apps is at a risk because, while downloading it can access all details from phones, tablets, iPad etc. Anyone can save photographs, videos from profiles and misuse it. For example; there are numerous cases in which girls are threatened by the opposite gender for revealing personal information. This breach of privacy does not affect a single person, rather the negative influence comes on whole family as well as society. Lastly, it has been observed that too much use of social networking has created face to face communication problems. People are so busy in updating their current statuses in media that they are missing the real essence of happiness.
To conclude, technology should be used in an appropriate manner; excess results in ugly consequences. Impact of excessive social networking might not be visible in the near future but in long-term, this is detrimental for society as well as for people.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television has destroyed communication among friends and family.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 73
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student.However, there are many problems with this arrangement and you find itvery difficult to work.Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college. In your letterdescribe the situatio 73
- Some people think secondary school students should study international news as one of their subjects. Other people say this is a waste of valuable school time. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- Some people think secondary school students should study international news as one of their subjects. Other people say this is a waste of valuable school time. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a pessimistic manner" with adverb for "pessimistic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eeply entrenched the society and people in a pessimistic manner. I completely agree that networking web...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 40, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate manner" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... To conclude, technology should be used in an appropriate manner; excess results in ugly consequences. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, well, while, as for, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31470588235 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75454170417 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632352941176 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6234740571 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1052631579 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8947368421 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138504884265 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404464628703 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402530265451 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833306720924 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324763544068 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.