It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends.
Having a good friend is really a special kind of blessing. A good friend usually becomes our best friend in the long run of life. I believe that in order to build a strong friendship, old friends should be preserved. I have this opinion because of the following reasons which I will explain in the next few passages.
First of all, when I think of friendship, I see the main important characteristic of loyalty. A true friendship has this essential factor, which takes a big time to develop. When we become friends with someone, we inculcate feelings, respect towards each other. We even become protective and have each other’s back from time to time. For example, I remember during my undergraduate days, I made my first friend from college, and till now, even after 7 years we are really good friend. We share many secrets, many stories, even studied for our exams together, our families knows about how good our friendship is. Having an old friend, gives a person whom you can call your own, and eventually can become just like your family member. As they say, a best friend is nothing but sister/ brother from another mother.
Secondly, an old friend is always honest to you. A good friend will always give out better and honest suggestion, whether you like it or not. For example, when I had my first break up, my friend suggested the person whom with I broke up was not good for me. I listened to her advice and never got back to him. Later after days, I came to know that the guy was really just a play boy. Whereas, I had one another friend, who was new that time, she suggested me to go for him as he was using that new friend as a mediocre to reach me. If ever I had listened to my new friend I would have got hurt again. With this experience, I can conclude that not every new friend is good for you. You would never know how the new person would make a benefit from you, or may even envy you.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that keeping up old friends is way far better and safer than making and trusting new friends. This is because, in any relationship, building the trust, loyalty, honesty and love takes years of connection, and this is found in our old friends.
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 58
- Young people enjoy their life more than old people. 70
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty. 50
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 73
- Professor's appearance on television. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 752, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...t like your family member. As they say, a best friend is nothing but sister/ brot...
^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t new friend as a mediocre to reach me. If ever I had listened to my new friend I ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45024875622 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42643936252 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6516001475 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7826086957 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4782608696 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13043478261 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268672757445 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760245991201 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822000772652 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174438468082 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760380098886 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 58.1214874552 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.