The use of cell phones while driving should be strictly forbidden. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The debate over the driver's usage of mobile phones has not been put to rest. Some people believe that these devices should be forbidden during the motion time. But is this that worthwhile? For me, I firmly agree that that government should impose a strong limitation in this particular case.
To begin with, the major reason for such people's rights restriction is that driving is dangerous under such conditions. This is because drivers often lose concentration when doing both activities simultaneously. In my experience, once in 2010, I was talking by mobile phone and nearly have bumped another car. Had I not used this device, I would never have got in such an awful situation. Moreover, it is generally agreed that electromagnetic emission from any kind of redundant instruments could have an adverse impact on the car's systems. This is due to the fact that modern automobiles are full of electronics which are already installed and work primarily by using wireless technology with similar frequency. A good instance here is a well-known sound from the cars radio speakers which you can hear when speaking by phone there.
Another reason why limitation should be applied is that driving under such conditions slowers the transport system pace in the city. This cause many traffic problems ranging from small jams at the crossroads in the mornings to gargantuan ones right before some holidays like Christmas or New Year near the shopping mall. In addition, it appears that it is harder to get to the destination on time due to this kind of driving. Personally, I have stopped using my own car in Moscow since 2012, because public transport, especially the underground is more convenient when you do not want to be late.
Having said that, not only are there many dangerous factors for using cell phones by drivers but also there are many advantages of its prohibition, so the government should implement a strict law with such regulations. Not only this would improve the safety on the roads but also this would better the transport situation in cities.
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child’s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school. Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion. 78
- Online communication is preferable to face to face communication Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- In the future, it may be scientifically possible for people to live for 150 years. This is a largely negative development with dangerous effects on our society.Do you agree with this viewpoint? 61
- Some people believe that it is the best to travel to foreign countries alone while others prefer to go with people they know Discuss both views and give your opinion 39
- Nowadays many countries are facing the problem of heavy traffic and congestion. Describe the situation in your home country and suggest some solutions. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'drivers'' or 'driver's'?
Suggestion: drivers'; driver's
The debate over the drivers usage of mobile phones has not been put...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.48453608247 254% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 4.92783505155 183% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 3.03092783505 495% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 32.9175257732 103% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.85567010309 363% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 937.175257732 184% => OK
No of words: 345.0 206.0 167% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99420289855 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 3.78020617076 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70020497561 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 127.690721649 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 290.88556701 182% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.13402061856 99% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.9583834614 44.8134815571 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.352941176 76.5299724578 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 16.8248392259 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 4.34317383033 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.49484536082 468% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19534426026 0.216113520407 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538140285968 0.0766984524023 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462179243759 0.0603063233224 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117453272287 0.12726935374 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181991241438 0.0580467560999 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 8.37731958763 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 70.7449484536 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 8.71597938144 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 7.59969072165 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 41.2886597938 201% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 8.62886597938 81% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.