In some countries governments pay the money for students' university fees, while in other countries students pay for themselves. Do advantages of governments paying for the students outweigh its disadvantages?
Students in some countries can be given to university education without tuition fees. On the other hand, there are still many countries where university students should pay for it. I believe that there are more significant benefits regarding governments' financial support in university fees than its drawbacks.
Some opponents who are against the governments' free scholarly fee policy tend to argue that as their countries invest a significant amount of budget in education, they cannot allocate the money for other essential welfare programmes, which are designed for the various generations such as rehabilitation centres and excellent quality of healthcare services. Besides, there might be possible that some students who are not interested in studying or academic development might feel pressured because the society seems to force all students to gain higher levels of education potentially.
However, free university education systems bring about more favourable effects on students and society. The most advantageous factor is that every student living in some countries which provide high education access for free receive an equal educational opportunity. For this reason, many students who cannot support themselves financially can take advantage of it. Socially, there would be more plenty of competent and educated people because many pupils are allowed to gain an upper level of academic knowledge as well as practical skills, which result in the better human workforce in workplaces in society.
In conclusion, university education for free supported by governments can lead to more different merits to students and society such as an equal educational chance individually and smarter and more skilled people society rather than its demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-23 | marykim7178 | 61 | view |
- The given first pie chart gives information about typical Australian household energy usages while the second pie chart presents the rate of greenhouse gas emissions caused by Australian household, which lead to environmental problems. 84
- The given first pie chart gives information about typical Australian household energy usages while the second pie chart presents the rate of greenhouse gas emissions caused by Australian household which lead to environmental problems 82
- The given first pie chart gives information about typical Australian household energy usages while the second pie chart presents the rate of greenhouse gas emissions caused by Australian household, which lead to environmental problems. 56
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult America in two of the years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where re 84
- In many schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts subjects (eg. languages) and boys choose science subjects (eg. Physics). What do you think are the reasons? Do you think that this tendency should be changed? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, regarding, so, still, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6679245283 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86834654293 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.8408410956 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.2 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367402244599 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164329029147 0.084324248473 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108976626845 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243220491573 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105168485381 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.