The first bar graph depicts the distribution of two different age groups bought tickets on the Internet during the beginning of 2006 in three countries (Australia, UK, Malaysic), where as the second supplied bar graph represents the most popular means used to buy them.
Overall, it is self-evident that young adults were more likely to book seats online if to consider countries except Malaysia. Meanwhile, desktop computers were highly prefered by population as a mean of access to booking on the web.
Firstly, both Australian and British middle-aged people resorted to online buying of tickets the most, however, the gap between numbers of population over 65 and the mid-aged was considerably bigger in the UK. While there was hearly half of the elderly in Australia, only roughly 40% of people in the same category tended to use Internet to buy tickets. By contrast, slightly lower proportion of young Malaysian adults booked seats than older ones.
Secondly, according to the data from the second chart, it is apparent that the greater percentage of people who used modern technologies in an effort to purchase tickets was from Malaysia. Despite the gueral trend of increasing popularity of electronic devices from Australia to Britain to Malaysia, laptops were the least widespread gadget utilized for buying, accounting for approximately 30% of people. In the meantime, Australian population who prefered them were by almost 10% highen.
- Some people prefer to live in rented homes Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend
- TOEFL integrated writing: Dutch painter Rembrandt 73
- The widespread use of the Internet has brought many problems. What do you think are the main problems associated with the use of web? What solutions can you suggest? 83
- The line graph shows changing patterns of business communication in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...hree countries Australia, UK, Malaysic, where as the second supplied bar graph represent...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e most popular means used to buy them. Overall, it is self-evident that young a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31304347826 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77594310342 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64347826087 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0703291521 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.777777778 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161599216859 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535457266398 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588264770473 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905367405289 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530404688423 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.