The bar chart compares consumer spending on six different items in Germany, Italy, France, and Britain.
The bar chart compares consumer spending on six different items in Germany, Italy, France and Britain.
It is noticeable that people in Britain spent considerably more money than people living in the other three nations on all six products. Of the six items, photographic film was spent the most money on.
People in Britain spent just over £170,000 on photographic film, which was the highest recorded figure on the chart. By contrast, the lowest overall spenders were German, with roughly the same figures (just under £150,000) for each of the six items.
Levels of spending on toys were similar/equal in France and Italy, at nearly £160,000. However, the amount spent by French on photographic film and CDs was at £165,000 and nearly £158,000 respectively, slightly higher than that of Italians. By contrast, people in Italy paid out more for personal stereos, tennis racquets and perfumes. French people spent around £145,000 on tennis racquet, which was the lowest figure shown on the chart.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-08-25 | IVANTRUONG | 67 | view |
- Often, the most successful people--in business, athletics, entertainment, or any field--are those who have focused all of their attention on achieving a specific goal. Those who spread their energy in many directions may not be as successful. In your opin 61
- fish canning 92
- students mastering a second languages in 6 nations 67
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 59
- The maps show the changes of Shalton village from 1910 and 2010. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, so, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47058823529 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74570681029 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491978609626 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5091311247 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234690364874 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12366805278 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130685863683 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207054627325 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159430279882 0.0819641961636 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.