Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, significantly polluted invironment due to consuming much more fuel has been receiving a great deal of social attention. In my view, both of non-essential flights and the increase of private car usage must be reduced remarkably to protect the environment.
There are some reasons why two means of transport should be imitigated. Firstly, due to the fact that a great amount of emissions is released into the atmostphere, the air quality is becoming seriouly degradable. As a result, individuals have to face many health problems such as asthma and lung cancer nowadays, which poses a huge threat to the community health. If the governments make a considerable reduction of exhaust fumes, air-related problems will be decreased. Futhermore, when such sulfur dioxide emitted into the air, making a contribution to cause acid rain, and this is the main culprit of soil pollution. Consequently, the contaminated water could dissolve some important nutrients in soil and change the structure of the soil. For example, some places in my country the agricultural farming activities might not bring the effectiveness because of the lack of the soil fertility.
On the other hand, the over-exploitation of non-renewable energy resources such as oil, natural gases leads to the leakage happening in underground or marine, which causes negatively affects water environment. As a consequence, a great number of aquatic species are in danger of extinction, and water-borne diseases might cause serious health complications. For instance, in the northen area of Mekong river there are many local residents have to face seriously skin-related problems such as skin irritation and rashes.
In conclusion, I totally believe that the environment might be protected when the consumption of fossil fuels is decreased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-31 | nbui2 | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-21 | IVANTRUONG | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
- There have been many inventions in human history, such as the wheel. Some people think the most important thing is the internet. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- Pie charts 61
- Cinema attendance by age group 78
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their time. Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...coming seriouly degradable. As a result, individuals have to face many health pro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41009463722 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17300922484 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634069400631 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0222106305 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.1875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316712350406 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116990695253 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.20275038312 0.0667982634062 304% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244728803796 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.381526111645 0.056905535591 670% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.