The rich nations provides money for the poor ones
In recent years, the developed nations usually support the poor countries by supplying more money. But some people think that the rich ones should help the poor ones with other kinds of support to deal with the poverty more effectively. I agree partly with this idea.
On the one hand, there are good reasons why financial aid can bring various undeniable benefits for the poor countries. Firstly, providing a huge amount of money for these nations can help them to have enough budget to invest in the infrastructure of algriculture, industry and education. This creates a golden opportunity for residents of the developing countries to earn more money and improve their life. For instance, Vietnam usually receives the ODA resource of capital from Japan which encourages government to expand many factories and offer more job opportunities for Vietnamese. Another benefit is the available source of lending to many businesses such as: startups, medium enterprises and large coorperations. This brings more opportunities for citizens in the poor countires to broaden or start their bussiness without facing with the lack of the essential amount of captital.
However, in order to reach the complete effectiveness in addressing the poverty in developing countries, the rich ones should support other kinds of help. The developed nations can supply many full scholarships for the exellent residents in the poor ones to come and learn the advanced technology, science and education. After accomplishing the course, they can return and convey their precious knowledge to more people for applying in the real life. Moreover, the rich nations can help the poor ones to solve their poverty by assigning many experts in fields such as: algriculture, business and construction to give the valuable advices.
In conclusion, while I accept that the money is a useful support from the rich nations for the poor ones to deal with poverty, I believe that other supports should also be applied for reaching an outstanding result.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-30 | Phan Thị Minh Thiện | 67 | view |
- British adults use Internet 84
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002 89
- Table Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas 81
- Still starvation despite of advances 61
- British students speak other languages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27244582043 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81473700284 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538699690402 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5634653145 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.642857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441565211048 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144638114077 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930889826413 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287671913832 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327007138852 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.