Table Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas

Essay topics:

Table (Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas)

The given table shows the amount of euros (in millions) from saling Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in five nations of Europe in 1999 and 2004.

It is clear that all five European nations paid more millions of euros to receive Fairtrade-labelled coffee. Additionally, there was a sharp decrease in term of bananas in two of five European countries.

For coffee, UK took over the biggest amount in 1999 with 1,5 million euros and experienced an extremely significant increase to 20 million euros in 2004. Meanwhile, the figure for Swizerland witnessed a double rise from 3 to 6 million euros in 2004. In contrast, a slight enhance of this product was seen in other three nations to 2, 1,7 and 1 million euros respectively.

For bananas, Sweden and Denmark declined little in saling Fairtrade-labelled ones to 1 and 0,9 million euros respectively. By contrast, the figure for Swizerland was 15 million euros which was the highest amount in 1999 and went up dramatically to 47 million euros in 2004, compared to only 5,5 million and 4 million euros for UK and Belgium in this year.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-08-17 Phan Thị Minh Thiện 81 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94565217391 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10930368028 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527173913043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1959713717 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155793337403 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982979937098 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134819869453 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158362309797 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160218415429 0.0819641961636 195% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.