In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Despite the fact that enormous modern technologies are used in order to make the advances in agriculture, many people do not have enough food to eat. There are many reasons to explain this issue, including social, economic, and environmental-related problems. In this essay, I will answer the questions of why people in the world undergo this problem and how to solve this issue adequately.
It is evident that many nations have made some improvements to their agriculture such as changing suitable methods of farming for particular seeds by using technological advances. However, these improvements do not mean the famine of food can be solved. Environmentally speaking, most of the lands are not fertile sufficiently to grow plants because of soil erosion, or they have a rugged geographic location. Take Thai Binh, an impoverished province in Vietnam, as an example, the irrigation system cannot be constructed since most of its land is mountains. Meanwhile, water is one of the essential factors in cultivation; without water, how plants can grow up? Climate change, besides, also causes the famine. Extreme drought weather does not allow people to cultivate the crops. For instance, in some Africa country, it has not rained in years, and we can see the famine seriously in these regions nowadays. Another contributing factor is the poverty since food scarcity can affect only the poor people. It is difficult for impoverished people to access the modern agriculture machines because they lack this purchasing power. Furthermore, most of the poor people do not own any land to grow their own food while there is no money buying the food.
In order to solve this problem, the governments need to ensure that food is available for the poor for free or at concessional rates, and also the gap between the poor and the rich should be reduced significantly. One further response includes long-term investments such as improving cultivation conditions, diminishing environmental pollution, and furthermore giving more job opportunities to poor people. For example, communities and organizations can construct factories relating to agriculture to employ residents as the principal workforce.
To sum up, hunger continues to haunt millions of people because of many factors such as the changes of climate and wealth distribution. However, this situation can be solved optimally with the appropriate solutions from many aspects of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | BIBHU KALITA | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | yasamin27 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | Iruki | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | aria etemadi | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | JiaYanLi | 73 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both t 89
- The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age group Iin2002. It includes those with a degree, whose with a higher degree (postgraduate) and those with other qualifications. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The Table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35064935065 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08313548283 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4637247345 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.421052632 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227792608841 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653020406762 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687832226487 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157598684753 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899668314177 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.