Some employers reward members of staff for their expectional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others.To what extent is this style effective.Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
Nowadays the employees who excel from others with their personal abilities and success in their work are motivated by chiefs and awarded by giving extra money or other incentive payments. Some people are of the opinion that it can strongly motivate them while others completely ignore this statement and point out that it can have a negative effect on others. Personally, I believe that this style of management cannot impact so negatively as some people consider, but before drawing a quick conclusion this statement needs to be discussed.
First of all, we can acknowledge that as everyone else,...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-08-07 | moman_1031 | 50 | view |
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area and two sites S1 and S2 have been proposed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 86
- Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace every day Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages 66
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind such as reading and doing word puzzles Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time You should write at least 250 words You shou 68
- The graph below shows the number of weeks of maternity leave that mothers are entitled to in different countries. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 93
- The pie charts below show the units of electricity production of fuel by source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 75
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 307 350
No. of Characters: 1443 1500
No. of Different Words: 175 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.186 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.7 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.621 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 99 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 73 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 55 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.7 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.462 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.374 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.649 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.194 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5