The percentage of workers in a company graduated with science and art degree
The pie chart illustrates the proportion of employees in a firm who graduated in science and math with different degrees over 2 decades from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, while the percentage of workers who had finished their course in First Degree Science, First Degree Art and PhD Science saw a considerable rise, the other degrees fell drastically in their figures. Moreover, in both two years, Master Art, First Degree Science, and First Degree Art represented the highest figures of staff who graduated from.
In 1990, 36% of employees in that company graduated with First Degree in Art and Science, with each constituted 18% and those figures had reached 27% and 24% respectively by the end of that period after increasing dramatically. Significantly lower, the percentage of workers who had received degree from PhD Science just remained below 10% although there was a slight growth by 1%.
The proportion of workers who graduated in Master Art accounted for a quarter in the first years and this number witnessed the fastest decrease to 15% over 2 decades. Also in that period, the figures for Master Science and PhD Art dropped less considerably by 3% to 17% and 9% by agreement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- People in many countries have to spend more and more time away from their home. Why is this? What are the effects on people themselves and their families? 56
- The chart show the proportion graduate with with sciene degree and art degree in a company in 2000 73
- People in many countries have to spend more and more time away from their home. Why is this? What are the effects on people themselves and their families? 56
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0303030303 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74107990191 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540404040404 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.6997547378 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.285714286 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458349213287 0.215688989381 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202502142179 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556571939549 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270840092671 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083181027063 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.