proportion of graduate with sciene degree and art degree
The line graph illustrates the percentage of employeesa who had science or art degrees in a firm over 2 decades from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, in both two years, the majority of workers did not have PhD – Science certificate although there’s a slight increase in their figures. In addition, while the percentage of staff who graduated with PhD Science Degree and First Degree- Art increased significantly, the other degrees bucked that trend.
In 1990, the proportions of individuals who finished their studies in First Degree Art and First Degree Science were the same, at 18% each, and those statistics saw an increase to 24% and 275 by agreement in the final year. There was also a tiny increase in the proportion of employees who received degree in PhD Science to a minority of less than 10% from 1990 to 2010.
Following the reverse pattern, the percentage of Master Art underwent a substantial decrease from a quarter to 15% in 2000. The others, namely Master Science and PhD Art, also dived by 3% from 20% and 12% respectively.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 81
- THE GRAPH BELOW SHOWS CHANGE IN PROPORTION OF GDP IN THREE AREAS IN A PARTICULAR COUNTRY BETWEEN 2000 AND 2O20 100
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- . 78
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90449438202 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77387604893 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589887640449 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3188139891 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326719838978 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152883247022 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138684699512 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190388945573 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089320043219 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.