For schools, assessing teachers' teaching efficiency is a very important issue. But is it better to let other teachers assess a teacher's efficiency or to allow the students to do the assessments?
There is no shortage of debate whether it is better to let other teachers assess a teacher’s performance or allow the students do the job. In my opinion, it is more efficacious if the assessment is done by the pupils. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, students are involved with more teachers and experienced a variety of teachers through their studies in many years. As a result, they have seen many good and not very good teachers. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I remember when I was in seventh grade I had a new mathematics teacher, Miss Jones. She was graduated the year before and it was her first year of teaching. She used to write down the solution of a problem on the black board and explain it line by line, and only after the explanation, she would tell us what problem was. We had a hard time learning and understanding the lessons. When we consulted the situation with other teachers and the school principal, they did not understand what was buttering us and told us that they assessed this teacher through some examinations over months and that Miss Jones had a great academic resume. For this reason, I think that it should be up to students to assess the performance of a teacher.
Moreover, the students surely know better what works for them and what does not. A teacher would consider what method is the best for herself through her experience of going to school as a student, which was several years ago and might not work for the new generation of students. For instance, I remember when I was in first grade, my teacher, Mrs. Sadat, was very old and used dated methods of teaching, for example she used punishment whenever a student did something wrong or answered a question incorrectly. She used her big wooden ruler to hit on the poor student's hand. Although she and other teachers thought that this method is beneficial to the students and it results in better scores and behavior, the overall grades of that year was worse than any year of my education years, and the others'. Accordingly, it is better if the students are involved in assessment of their teachers.
In conclusion, though some may oppose my opinion, I strongly believe that it is far better to let students assess a teacher's efficiency than other teachers. This is because students experience different kind of teachers, and they know better about what teaching method is more beneficial to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lines'?
Suggestion: lines
...oblem on the black board and explain it line by line, and only after the explanation...
^^^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... is far better to let students assess a teachers efficiency than other teachers. This is...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6995412844 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65642970188 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48623853211 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4203184467 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5714285714 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7619047619 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361407454433 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112173568725 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120170616526 0.0737576698707 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262062806371 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787054963922 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.