The reading and lecture are both about the school organization system, and whether they are ideal or not. The reading states about the traditional schooling system and explains different levels in it. The lecturer talks about some of the weakness of this conventional schooling system.
First, the author states that school organization is the same for every student. Each student first goes to elementary school, then junior secondary, and finally high school. If a student fails in any grade, h/she would have to repeat that grade. The lecturer claims this as the most obvious weak point of this system. He states that this organization doesn't take into account differences in individuals. In other words, each student has a different rate of development. Some become physically and socially mature early and easily climb the grade ladder. Whereas, others do not grow at the same speed, fail to understand what's being taught and for this reason, some have to repeat the grade.
Second, the reading mentions that when a student gets passing grades or more h/she gets promoted to the next higher class, and if this is not the case then the student has to repeat that grade. This point is rebutted by the lecturer. He thinks this method of promotion does not show actual learning. Those students who have to repeat a grade get bored by studying the same material which further results in higher dropout rates. Moreover, he points out that group discussion, which are used as tools to grade the students, measure the ability of the group and the individual and thus is not an ideal way of measuring ability.
For the aforementioned reasons, the lecturer thinks that European school organization system is not an ideal one.
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: grades encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 60
- TOEFL integrated writing: Altruism. 3
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 88
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...em and explains different levels in it. The lecturer talks about some of the weakne...
^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... levels in it. The lecturer talks about some of the weakness of this conventional schooling...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ystem. He states that this organization doesnt take into account differences in indivi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...w at the same speed, fail to understand whats being taught and for this reason, some ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, thus, whereas, as to, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00694444444 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50530879236 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545138888889 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4778049624 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8235294118 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.082453956512 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348307918773 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496304576249 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660783077047 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424519246572 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.