The table above compares the percentage of children with different educational problems in school A and school B in 2005 and 2015.
It is clear from the table that the total percentage of students who were lack of educational abilities of school B was smaller than school A in both two years.
In 2005, the percentage of kids in every kind of problems of school A was many times as large as school B, particularly four times in handwriting, six times in spelling, seven times in following instruction, etc.… The students who had problems in following instructions of school A accounted for the largest portion with 42% while the main proportion of school B was 15% to kids who could not concentrate in lessons. The school A’s least percentage belonged to 22% of kids having the reading problem and school B’s was 5% to kids who were in spelling problem.
By 2015, because of a slow decrease in students with educational problems in school A and a slight growth in school B, the number of kids in both schools were not far in the distance like in 2005. Only the difference in reading and handwriting problem between school A and B in 2015 still remained the same to 2005.
The table above compares the percentage of children with different educational problems in school A and school B in 2005 and 2015.
It is clear from the table that the total percentage of students who were lack of educational abilities of school B was smaller than school A in both two years.
In 2005, the percentage of kids in every kind of problems of school A was many times as large as school B, particularly four times in handwriting, six times in spelling, seven times in following instruction, etc.… The students who had problems in following instructions of school A accounted for the largest portion with 42% while the main proportion of school B was 15% to kids who could not concentrate in lessons. The school A’s least percentage belonged to 22% of kids having the reading problem and school B’s was 5% to kids who were in spelling problem.
By 2015, because of a slow decrease in students with educational problems in school A and a slight growth in school B, the number of kids in both schools were not far in the distance like in 2005. Only the difference in reading and handwriting problem between school A and B in 2015 still remained the same to 2005.
- The line chart above gives us difference between world food and oil costs from 2000 to 2011. Generally, both food and oil prices increased steadily at the beginning of the period and picked up from 2008 to 2009. But only food price reaches top in 2011, ot 22
- The line chart above shows changes in the average money spent every month on children’s sports by parents from 2008 to 2010. The following graph compares the number of children taking part in three different physical activities, which are football, athl 73
- The line chart above compares the difference in the consumption of the four types of boneless meat of four different species per capita.It is clear that there were significant changes in the choice of meat in the US from 1955 to 2012. In general, beef and 78
- The table above compares the differences in the sales of coffee and banana whose Fairtrade labels had been attached in five countries in Europe in the two years of 1999 and 2004.It is clear that over the five-year period, the UK is still ranked the highes 73
- It is clear that there’s extreme contrary in the variations of the two values over the first decade of the 21st century. While more and more money was spent on cell phone service, landline phone, on the other hand, shows a tendency of steady decrease.Th 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7033492823 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.747594897 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483253588517 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.433176049 43.030603864 238% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 163.833333333 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.8333333333 22.9334400587 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.64673918685 0.215688989381 300% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.397358029944 0.103423049105 384% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192302383553 0.0843802449381 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.500132989516 0.15604864568 320% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164138617168 0.0819641961636 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.