To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Allocating budget has always been one of the challenges that authorities of a university have faced with it. Since it is crucial to invest money in the area that a university can promote. Some people may hold the view that for improving the quality of education in the universities it is better to spend more money on the salary of university professors However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe. From my own perspective, the former belief is true. In what follows, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that if professors have paid much, they feel satisfied. It means that they see the university worth their attempts and appreciate them. Hence, they encourage make more attempt and transform their all knowledge to their students. For example, when I was a college student, I had a professor which had much salary among other college’s professors. Also, his class was one of the most useful class I have had ever. He taught us with passion and share all his information with us.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that a professor with a high salary does not worry about their expenses. They can allocate all time to research and learn new materials. Hence, it helps them to always be up to date in their fields.in addition, students can use this information to increase their knowledge and broaden their perspectives. For instance, I remember the first day of chemistry class in the university. Since my professor was the oldest one I have had, I thought that he does not have any variable information and knowledge about this subject and all he knew it belongs to the past. However, after a couple of sessions, I realize I was wrong. He spent most of his time in his office doing research and helping students. he introduced us to many useful and appropriate websites and software to do our projects and read the latest articles about chemistry.
In conclusion, this is my deep belief that not only does having a decent salary cause the professors being rewarded but also makes them be up to date. Therefore, I highly suggest that universities should allude more money to their professors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 70
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 70
- peary's journey 70
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 70
- The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ies of a university have faced with it. Since it is crucial to invest money in the ar...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind substantiating'.
Suggestion: mind substantiating
...ng reasons. The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 748, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ce doing research and helping students. he introduced us to many useful and approp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8664921466 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74285718467 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528795811518 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4904837506 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5238095238 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1904761905 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22052158801 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062994736737 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106056910729 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166139658386 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122970813319 0.0645574589148 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.