The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table below compares five different countries in terms of amount of spent money on some items in 2002.Generally, it is clear that Turkey had by far the highest percentage in consuming food, drinks and tobacco.
Comparing Ireland and Turkey, the greatest rate of consuming in all three types of goods is dedicated to Turkey. With nearly 3% decrease, Ireland is remained second consumer of the first good category at 28.91% while this scale is about similar in consuming clothes and footwear with 6.43% in Ireland and 6.63% in Turkey where leisure and education are doubled.
In the second comparison, Spain had had the top rate in food, drinks and tobacco consumption with 18.8% compared with 16.36% and 15.77% in Italy and Sweden respectively. Although in clothing and footwear group, the highest percentage was donated to Italy, Sweden had majority of leisure and education consumers with a slight difference with Italy.
To recap, Turkey was the biggest supplier in food, drink and tobacco and even in leisure and education though the number of consumers of clothing and footwear in Italy hit the peak.
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 69
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. 73
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while other think it is unfair.Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 85
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? or is it the responsibility of the government of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves? 73
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 91
flaws:
Need to compare generally to all countries. Not only 'Comparing Ireland and Turkey'.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 184 200
No. of Characters: 899 1000
No. of Different Words: 103 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.683 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.886 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.441 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 66 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 50 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 34 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.134 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.5 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.833 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.131 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4